- Hp drivers download underscore in extension upgrade#
- Hp drivers download underscore in extension software#
- Hp drivers download underscore in extension free#
Microsoft is just reaping one of the joys of their monpoly status! After all, Win98 is by far the most widly used HOME system…still at 60%+ MS did a GREAT job getting their monopoly with Win98…and it really was a monopoly back then. Linux distributers that have used this business model all along. The question is how well will they stack up with e.g. net platform that could be the base of such services. Microsoft knows this and they are starting to prepare for that time by intorducing the.
Hp drivers download underscore in extension software#
In the end, the only way to make money out of software is to sell software related services. Just as we will see OSes turning into a comodity bread and butter software like Office suites will go the same direction,
Hp drivers download underscore in extension free#
Microsoft is now on the top of that curve.Īt the same time free desktop environments like Linux is still on the steep part of that S-curve, where small development efforts results in major improvements in user satisfaction.Īt some point people will find that free alternatives to windows is good enough, and use them instead. If we plot users satisfaction against development effort we would expect to see an S-shaped curve. In other words when the customers need is satisfied it doesn’t matter what gizmos you invent companies won’t buy it. As new OS versions is developed it becomes increasingly difficult to make improvements to functionality that is worth the cost of an upgrade.
Hp drivers download underscore in extension upgrade#
Imagine how hard it will be to get them to upgrade from NT to 2k,XP and eventually Longhorn. Yes, but if it’s hard to get people to upgrade from win95 to NT. These companies would benefit greatly to an NT just to save on down time. >I can understand why a home user might not want to upgrade, but a business still running Win 9x is insane. I thought we threw out all those Wyse terminals years ago and now here comes round two. Just when the entire world thought the business desktop market was going to vanish from the clutches of MS, here comes another wave of boot to LAN systems without a real need for a local desktop. Our future workstation replacements will take the thin approach. Our users, support staff, and management all adapted quickly and thats the most important part.
Terminal services is less than perfect, but it makes a good deal of sense in SOME situations. It’s not just MS who wants you to upgrade your OS, it’s Dell, Compaq/HP, and others….FWIW: They all can go thru a very long sales presentation, without ever uttering “open source” as an option. Much of which tends to unravel a well polished sales presentation. It’s a decent way to extend the life of the network while preserving the existing infrastucture. TS also reduces a good deal of the security concerns with 9x systems. It steals their hopes of convincing a shop to upgrade basic workstations simply due to age, and performance. Can you imagine how much OEM’s like Dell and Compaq/HP hate Terminal Services?(apart from selling a high-end server) However,in this case it’s not just MS involved.
You have a good idea, and others have had the same thought. I agree with you, but I would also look for some creative licensing changes from MS. It isn’t for me that the vast majority of the users I support. rant over/ Honestly, so MS says OpenOffice only has as many features as Office 97 as if thats a handicap. I also hate how everthing gets moved around in every new version of Office, why? To f*ck with us and see if we’re paying attention? I support lots of users who use versions of Office ranging from 97 to 2003 and often the user themselves have no idea what version their running, having to walk them through something and they tell me “sure, 20003, thats what I have” when its really 2000 is a massive pain. A 1 ghz machine? Now its sluggish? That can’t be right. We just upgraded to Office 2003, since many users are now using that, and – one a not that old 1 ghz machine!!! – everythings freaking slower then Office XP. I /hate/ those darned MS commercials, their just lame! People acting like they just got handed a million bucks because “you got the new microsoft office!” The vast majority of the features of MS Office I have zero use for, and I use it every day at work.
0 kommentar(er)
